Some sites that co-ordinate it:
Google
(See their name on the 3rd
advert) The firm that also harvest your search engine
accesses. Why not choose one from a list of different search
engine providers, & help reduce their monopoly ?
(Note just switching search engine is not sufficient
to protect you. Google's tentacles extend further. They
also embed into other commercial companies. They also
embedded into non commercial site freebsd.org After the FreeBSD
project debated & accepted their terms (more search
statistics))
BBC 17 April 2014: "chief executive of Axel Springer, says his company is afraid of Google" How It's Done
Using information vendors at other sites have gleaned from
browsers (even when one doesn't login, or purchase from
vendor's web
Example: The special 12 V 17 Ah lead gell batteries advertised at Toytown { top of 2014-04-14T2005_front_page_ad.jpg & base of 2014-04-11T1339_frame.jpg } & top of meteoblue.com.jpg are not random popular batteries to advertise at a general public; but were targeted at me after I browsed those 2 minority interest batteries at Conrad.de (& 2nd Conrad URL) Conrad must have logged my browsing & fed to Toytown's operators probably via a marketing intermediary. (Which 3rd advert here declares to be Google, I confirmed it by clicking around on another minority product or 2 & saw them too advertised soon after on Toytown Other adverts on 3rd party pages will also include generic advertising, not individually targeted. If you had browsed a more private product perhaps from another vendor, you might not want it there when someone glanced at your screen, while you were browsing a supposedly innocuous advertiser. In the cases of adverts seen on Toytown & Meteoblue I had not logged in when I got them. Neither do I have a web account with Conrad. Consider what Toytown or similar social sites could do now or later in reverse, with extra personal information members are invited to give in their personal profile, + browsing & posting history: who it might be sold to, exchanged with, or lost to on site intrusion. Scenarios would be yet worse on USA based sites where EU data privacy laws ignored, & the NSA syphon off masses of data. How to block it
Examples of individually targeted advertising
(On a seperate page, else as wide bit images, they would have
forced all text on this page to have been viewed on a wide
screen).
Better Prices Perhaps By Cleverly Deciding When To Deliberately Incur cookies & When NOT To Delete Them ?
Just a suspicion so far ...
When browsing prior to purchase, you may want to browse some competition sites before going to your preferred vendor; & _not_ purging cookies in between & Not disconnecting & starting a new D-DNS session & Not telling browser to flush cookies & Not using my Unix script in between. Why: Maybe your preferred vendor sniffs where cookies are stored & if it sees cookies from a competitor vendor, it may offer you better prices ? I haven't proved it yet, but I think I may have seen it (shopping for car tyres). I presume most cookies from different vendors are encrypted so competitive vendors can't easily read each others cookies, but maybe just knowing the sort of name a competitor uses to store their cookies, & testing for existence, along with a recent time stamp on cookies file, is sufficient for a vendor to decide "This customer is market aware, offer a better price to compete harder!". Sometime I'll test &/or discuss viability Other Spies
As this page is co-titled "Web Spies" its also worth
remembering USA NSA are
spieing on everyone, & eg the Germans don't trust
Britain's GCHQ either, (Ref Merkel mobile, & see 2014 EU
election posters etc). 2014-05 the USA listed 5 Chinese inc 2
Chinese PLA members for spieing. So assume companies And
governments are probably trying to spy on you & each
other. UK GCHQ & alien American NSA spy on British MPs:
News David Davis comments on Computer Weekly's investigation
into the interception of MPs' email (At 2018-01-11 Davis
is now Minister for Brexit (DExEU)
Spy Blocking
Https & torproject .
org browser may protect you from NSA etc, but rather
harder to protect from targeted advertising.
|
||||
|